ONTARIO – The common-law test for recognition and enforcement of original foreign judgments does not apply to the recognition and enforcement of ricochet judgments, namely, a judgment of a foreign court that is then enforced in a jurisdiction with which the original judgment has no connection.
Continue readingCase #054D – Mundo Media Ltd. (Re)
ONTARIO – Arbitration clause found to be inoperative by virtue of single proceeding model in insolvency proceedings and receiver being a creature of a court order. In an insolvency proceeding parties cannot contract out of the single proceeding model where one party may make claims that will affect all creditors.
Continue readingCase #053D – Hudson’s Bay Company ULC v Oxford Properties Retail Holdings II Inc.
ONTARIO – A judge does not have discretion to fundamentally alter the relief from forfeiture remedy, such that, new terms of the lease are imposed by the court upon the parties, even during a pandemic. If a tenant cannot bring itself into compliance with the lease within a reasonable, specified time period, relief from forfeiture is not the appropriate remedy.
Continue readingCase #052D – PureFacts Financial Solutions et al. v Cheung et al.
ONTARIO – Responding to a Request for Proposals is not solicitation. Leave to appeal of arbitral award pursuant to section 45 (1) of the Arbitration Act, 1991 (“Act”) denied. The arbitrator correctly applied the test for assessing the reasonableness of a restrictive covenant in an employment contract and made no errors in law.
Continue readingCase #051D – Irwin v. Protiviti
ONTARIO – Arbitration – An appeal from a judge, who stayed an action under s. 7(1) of the Ontario Arbitration Act, 1991 in favour of arbitration and determination of jurisdiction by the arbitrator, applied the mandatory provisions of the Act correctly. There were no exceptional circumstances requiring the arbitrator’s jurisdiction to be determined by the court.
Continue readingCase #050E – Goberdhan v. Knights of Columbus
ONTARIO – Where there was no consideration for a contract containing a mandatory arbitration clause, the Court exercised its discretion to refuse to stay the action under s. 7(2) the Arbitration Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c.17 on the basis that the arbitration clause was invalid. Section 7(1) of the Act applies to cases where the interpretation of the arbitration clause is at issue, not where the clause’s very existence is questioned.
Continue readingCase #049E – Dufferin v. Morrison Hershfield
Application to remove a sole arbitrator of a complex construction dispute due to alleged apprehension of bias dismissed. The Arbitrator was selected for his construction expertise and was permitted to question witnesses and ask questions at any time during the hearing under a procedural order. The arbitrator’s interventions, unlike interventions by a trial judge, were not evidence of bias.
Continue readingCase #048E – Force One Marketing et al. v. Rritual Superfoods
ONTARIO – Forum Non Conveniens -The Ontario Court had jurisdiction to hear a contract dispute on the basis that the Ontario Court has jurisdiction simpliciter over the subject-matter of the contract, even though the defendant did not have a substantial connection with Ontario. A BC forum selection clause in a related agreement was not binding on the plaintiff. The defendant failed to prove that Ontario was not the forum conveniens to hear the dispute.
Continue readingCase #047D – Aquanta Group Inc. v. Lightbox Enterprises Ltd.
ONTARIO – In a second arbitration between the same parties, the Court rejected the claimant’s request to appoint the same arbitrator on the basis that vocal objection to the appointment of a “repeat arbitrator” should be taken seriously and there was no identifiable advantage for the re-appointment.
Continue readingCase #046D – Magna International Inc. v Granite Real Estate Inc.
ONTARIO – Arbitration Agreement valid despite not specifying a “seat”. Court directs the arbitrator to determine the applicable procedural law for the arbitration.
Continue reading